Secton 7.1 is about Substitution, the most important of the main techniques for evaluating antiderivatives. The main idea for Substitution is to construct an antiderivative rule or technique which uses the Chain Rule for derivatives backwards, the way the other rules in Section 4.1 used derivative rules backwards. The goal is to be able to find antiderivatives for functions formed as compositions of other functions. However, because of the form of the Chain Rule, the antiderivatives will require a bit of pattern-matching to make the technique work out. Recall the Chain Rule for derivatives:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Constant multiples can be manipulated pretty freely in antiderivatives
in order to find the right match for the
pattern.
Here are a few problems that require changing constant multiples:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Even this, though, is not quite enough to fully capture how Substitution can
be used in evaluating antiderivatives. The key really is the function
, and the appearance of
in the integrand. This is often
the hardest part of the pattern to recognize.
In the Substitution formula above, note that if
, then
-- in ``differential form,''
. Rewriting the above Substitution formula making the
change of variables
and substituting
for
as well, you get the following formula:
There are two ways to handle definite integrals when you evaluate
the antiderivative by Substitution. The first is to evaluate the
antiderivative using the procedure above, arriving at a final answer in
terms of
, then plugging in the endpoints as in the Fundamental Theorem.
However, by thinking of Substitution as a change of variables, it is
possible to modify the definite integral in a way that allows you to skip
the back-substitution step, but will nonetheless guarantee the same answer:
Here are a few more problems -- these may or may not call for Substitution:
And here are some more examples -- in each case, evaluate the integral:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |